no i haven't really read anything
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
was it worth it
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
i have read not even 1 book
whats your name?
lol
i understand
plato
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its good short few pages
we can only engage in such a way
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
your feed looks like my tumblr
yeah
division of reality is straying away from it
like magnets
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
isaac newton
lol yea
i want to do that too
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
the site i am dreaming
so the method has to be autonomous
was it worth it
and the fake qualifier
thank you
i really havent
bro i read nothing in my life
brb i will read and reply sincerely
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now