so the method has to be autonomous
bro i read nothing in my life
we need to be deconstructing our identities
its good
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
no like which do people call me
abrar?
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
god being the centre magnet
so an active mazelike process
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
isaac
its good short few pages
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
no i haven't really read anything
or never left
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
autonomy of learning
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
barren land
all that is to say
whats your name?
ahnaf abrar
ion
i was tempted to lie about my name
like first name
have you read
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
what do you think my name is