And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.
abrar?
autonomy of learning
you cannot feed someone truth
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
as in
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
so the method has to be autonomous
division of reality is straying away from it
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
yeah
i really havent
which magnetises chains of pins
feel you
god being the centre magnet
was it worth it
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
propensity within someone
He went in there with a camera to film it before he moved out of the building. He didn't think anyone would believe the story if he didn't have proof.
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
Wed, 11 Nov 2025 21:12:41
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
like first name
Thank you, Jack