its performative

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so the method has to be autonomous

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

bro i read nothing in my life

send link

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

as in

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

...

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.

so an active mazelike process

...

not so on: yvf(wthw)

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

that looks like my instagram account