and the fake qualifier
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
so at the end
that looks like my instagram account
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
you cannot feed someone truth
your feed looks like my tumblr
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
not their contents
much more tactility
fw
bro i read nothing in my life
i love it here
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i dont understand magnetisation
what do you mean
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
magnetisation/form
is everyoneback on tumblr now
like magnets
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
isaac
i have read not even 1 book
no like which do people call me
plato
And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
we need to be deconstructing our identities
i was tempted to lie about my name
its good short few pages
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
i understand
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
but i respect your search