division of reality is straying away from it
all that is to say
propensity within someone
i have read not even 1 book
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
that looks like my instagram account
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
so the method has to be autonomous
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
as in
so an active mazelike process
magnetisation/form
plato
much more tactility
fw
isaac newton
its good
or never left
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
send your tumblr