i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
its performative
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i understand
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
no i haven't really read anything
isaac
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
your feed looks like my tumblr
plato
its good
all that is to say
isaac newton
its good short few pages
feel you
thank you
is everyoneback on tumblr now
which magnetises chains of pins
i have read not even 1 book
so the method has to be autonomous
division of reality is straying away from it
what do you think my name is
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i love it here
so at the end
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
is this you as well
But seriously, thank you, Jack
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.