i understand
i dont understand magnetisation
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
yeah
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
you cannot feed someone truth
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
autonomy of learning
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
plato
have you read
division of reality is straying away from it
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
whats your name?
its good
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
we need to be deconstructing our identities
god being the centre magnet
its good short few pages
much more tactility
"Put a blanket."
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
and the fake qualifier
i love it here
i really havent
ion
magnetisation/form
no like which do people call me
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.