no longer writing in the third person
something religious, a kind of complex,
it will get lighter
, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc. 13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
currently
what do you mean
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its good
no like which do people call me
its good
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
and the fake qualifier
abrar?
Can I see
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i understand
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
plato