you cannot feed someone truth

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

or never left

as in

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

idk

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

is everyoneback on tumblr now

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

much more tactility

IWGD

so an active mazelike process

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

your feed looks like my tumblr

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

like first name

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

magnetisation/form

hello reader,