its good
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
autonomy of learning
its performative
so the method has to be autonomous
all that is to say
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
wait what is that
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
yeah
its good
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
whats your name?
ion
plato
you cannot feed someone truth
we can only engage in such a way
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
propensity within someone
which magnetises chains of pins
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
magnetisation/form
i understand
like magnets
i dont understand magnetisation
have you read
ahnaf abrar
i want to do that too
so at the end
much more tactility
we need to be deconstructing our identities
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
lol yea
so an active mazelike process
isaac newton
abrar?
i was tempted to lie about my name
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books