i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue
but really the thing should be autonomous
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
feel you
plato
as in
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
isaac newton
autonomy of learning
not their contents
its good short few pages
i was tempted to lie about my name
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i want to do that too
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
is this you as well
all that is to say
i love it here
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
bro i read nothing in my life
Can I see
theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine