there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
division of reality is straying away from it
not their contents
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 23:49:08
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:11:24
hiding from the rain
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
yes
I am below everything.
i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate