i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
so at the end
we need to be deconstructing our identities
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
abrar?
what do you think my name is
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
was it worth it
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like first name
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
so an active mazelike process
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
and the fake qualifier
yeah
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
its good
We look out over the river to a block of luxury flats built on the site of some old docks. It would be nice to live right there. Yes.
no i haven't really read anything
the textwall is as much for me as it is for you
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
yes
i dont understand magnetisation