no i haven't really read anything

...

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

yeah

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

ahnaf abrar

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

we need to be deconstructing our identities

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

much more tactility

so the method has to be autonomous

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

not so on: yvf(wthw)

what do you think my name is

plato

isaac

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

hello reader,

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.

thank you

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

we can only engage in such a way

magnetises a pin

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

lol yea