there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
not so on: yvf(wthw)
or never left
bro i read nothing in my life
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i want to do that too
barren land
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
lol
ahnaf abrar
and the fake qualifier
ion
plato
no like which do people call me
i was tempted to lie about my name
like first name
whats your name?
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
it is hopeful
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
and the fake qualifier
"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."
Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15