there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

what do you think my name is

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

as in

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

idk

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

have you read

is this you as well

plato

so at the end

like magnets

i dont understand magnetisation

lol yea

plato

feel you

all that is to say

no i haven't really read anything

what do you mean

whats your name?

i love it here

its good

you cannot feed someone truth

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

its good

we can only engage in such a way

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

the site i am dreaming

its good short few pages

autonomy of learning