i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i love it here

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i was tempted to lie about my name

propensity within someone

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i really havent

i want to do that too

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

that looks like my instagram account

no like which do people call me

bro i read nothing in my life

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

brb i will read and reply sincerely

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

we need to be deconstructing our identities

we can only engage in such a way

so the method has to be autonomous

as in

is this you as well

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.

abrar?

send link

bro i read nothing in my life

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos