okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

what do you mean

is everyoneback on tumblr now

much more tactility

i understand

autonomy of learning

its good

all that is to say

you cannot feed someone truth

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

yeah

so an active mazelike process

feel you

is this you as well

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

we can only engage in such a way

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

so at the end

no longer writing in the third person

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

idk

like first name

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

ahnaf abrar