i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49

I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.

hiding from the rain

we can only engage in such a way

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

no like which do people call me

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

you cannot feed someone truth

which magnetises chains of pins

propensity within someone

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so an active mazelike process

We gather around the start of a causeway down to the Thames. It's a pretty cold night and there's a breeze coming off the river.

currently

its good

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

It's

dusk

in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.
It bites my wrist but there is only a dull ache.
I feel that it wants to say sorry but can't. I die.

so the method has to be autonomous

Better Lift

magnetisation/form

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i dont understand magnetisation