i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
division of reality is straying away from it
we need to be deconstructing our identities
plato
have you read
its good short few pages
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
is this you as well
so the method has to be autonomous
not their contents
magnetisation/form
its good
you cannot feed someone truth
what do you mean
i love it here
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
as in
what do you think my name is
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
i see a website
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
like magnets
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 23:49:08
no i haven't really read anything