so at the end
god being the centre magnet
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
thank you
isaac newton
not their contents
magnetises a pin
i understand
and the fake qualifier
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
as in
all that is to say
we can only engage in such a way
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
ahnaf abrar
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
your feed looks like my tumblr
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
plato
idk
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
lol yea
much more tactility
i want to do that too
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.fw
feel you