there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
as in
you cannot feed someone truth
have you read
not their contents
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
magnetisation/form
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
magnetises a pin
all that is to say
thank you
whats your name?
propensity within someone
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
like magnets
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
isaac
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
Thank you, Jack
autonomy of learning
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
"Put a blanket."