there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

all that is to say

barren land

i dont understand magnetisation

its performative

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

its good

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

so the method has to be autonomous

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

ion

was it worth it

plato

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

propensity within someone

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

IWGD

i want to do that too

i was tempted to lie about my name

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

yeah

no i haven't really read anything

Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl