much more tactility

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

like magnets

so the method has to be autonomous

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

like first name

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

what do you mean

its good short few pages

we need to be deconstructing our identities

i dont understand magnetisation

i love it here

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

feel you

i want to do that too

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

not their contents

yeah

a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it

so at the end