my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
division of reality is straying away from it
idk
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
plato
what do you think my name is
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we need to be deconstructing our identities
yeah
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
so the method has to be autonomous
feel you
i dont understand magnetisation
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
so at the end
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
not their contents
i was tempted to lie about my name
so an active mazelike process
have you read
its good short few pages
"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"
no i haven't really read anything
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
There is a pause. She ashes her cigarette. It falls on me. It seems like the birds have stopped too.
...