whats your name?

i dont understand magnetisation

its good

its good


plato

no i haven't really read anything

magnetisation/form

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

its performative

god being the centre magnet

hello reader,

i understand

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

not their contents

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

all that is to say


nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

yeah

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

bro i read nothing in my life

isaac

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

not so on: yvf(wthw)

wait what is that

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

thank you

what do you think my name is