there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
kind of mythopoesis
we can only engage in such a way
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
"Put a blanket."
The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls