the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

whats your name?

no i haven't really read anything

so the method has to be autonomous

what do you mean

i understand

i dont understand magnetisation

its good

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

which magnetises chains of pins

isaac newton

as in

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

its performative

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

isaac

much more tactility

i really havent

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

no longer writing in the third person

fw

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting