Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?

lol yea

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

is this you as well

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

and the fake qualifier

was it worth it

as in

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

plato

i have read not even 1 book

its good

magnetisation/form

i love it here

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

ahnaf abrar

like first name

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

is everyoneback on tumblr now

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

what do you think my name is

we can only engage in such a way

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

so the method has to be autonomous

its performative

not their contents

idk

i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue

division of reality is straying away from it

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

all that is to say