mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i have read not even 1 book

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

much more tactility

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

or never left

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

magnetises a pin

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

plato

abrar?

magnetisation/form

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

was it worth it

your feed looks like my tumblr

lol

all that is to say

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

you cannot feed someone truth

thank you

that looks like my instagram account

plato

god being the centre magnet

idk

fw

yeah

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i understand