ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

its good

division of reality is straying away from it

all that is to say

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

propensity within someone

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

so at the end

plato

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

is this you as well

plato

so an active mazelike process

what do you think my name is

He went in there with a camera to film it before he moved out of the building. He didn't think anyone would believe the story if he didn't have proof.

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

We gather around the start of a causeway down to the Thames. It's a pretty cold night and there's a breeze coming off the river.

no i haven't really read anything

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

bro i read nothing in my life

its performative

We look out over the river to a block of luxury flats built on the site of some old docks. It would be nice to live right there. Yes.

so the method has to be autonomous

we need to be deconstructing our identities

you cannot feed someone truth