a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext

Rain, starting

13, H, grate

FOUNDING DOCUMENT

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

like magnets

IWGD

i dont understand magnetisation

its good

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

plato

its good

division of reality is straying away from it

It Will Get Lighter

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

much more tactility

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

sorry i am texting like a slav

magnetises a pin

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so an active mazelike process

lol

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.