so the method has to be autonomous
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
not their contents
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
we can only engage in such a way
as in
that looks like my instagram account
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
yeah
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
lol
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
much more tactility
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
thank you
what do you mean
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
idk
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
ahnaf abrar
no i haven't really read anything
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
i really havent
abrar?
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting