was it worth it

lol

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

so at the end

isaac

and the fake qualifier

its good

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

its good short few pages

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

so an active mazelike process

i dont understand magnetisation

bro i read nothing in my life

its performative

plato

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

magnetisation/form

propensity within someone

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

plato

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

currently

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

division of reality is straying away from it

yes

i was tempted to lie about my name

i love it here