okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i love it here

is this you as well

like magnets

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

propensity within someone

its performative

all that is to say

and the fake qualifier

so the method has to be autonomous

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

sorry i am texting like a slav

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

its good

bro i read nothing in my life

you cannot feed someone truth

i was tempted to lie about my name

the site i am dreaming

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

i dont understand magnetisation

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it