thank you

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

like magnets

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

isaac

division of reality is straying away from it

autonomy of learning

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

yeah

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

and the fake qualifier

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i really havent

i dont understand magnetisation

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

and the fake qualifier

no i haven't really read anything

its performative

all that is to say

sorry i am texting like a slav

i want to do that too

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

plato

the site i am dreaming

like first name

what do you mean