think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

its performative

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i understand

Overall meaning: The dream seems to explore vulnerability, unspoken emotion, and the tension between connection and isolation. It suggests you may be processing intense feelings of longing or missed opportunities, and your subconscious is guiding you to acknowledge, release, or transform them.

as in

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it

...

much more tactility

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

we can only engage in such a way

i really havent

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation