really i want the internet
we need to be deconstructing our identities
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
isaac newton
sorry i am texting like a slav
i want to do that too
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
all that is to say
Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.so the method has to be autonomous
i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
as in