so at the end

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i love it here

idk

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

plato

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

lol yea

abrar?

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

no i haven't really read anything

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

what do you mean

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so an active mazelike process

But seriously, thank you, Jack

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.

It Will Get Lighter

Slug

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

its good

we can only engage in such a way

i really havent

December 2025

its good short few pages

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

division of reality is straying away from it

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

bro i read nothing in my life