nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
much more tactility
division of reality is straying away from it
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
is everyoneback on tumblr now
so an active mazelike process
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
barren land
is this you as well
its good short few pages
so the method has to be autonomous
lol yea
god being the centre magnet
not their contents
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
so at the end
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
isaac newton
sorry i am texting like a slav
its good
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
its good
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i dont understand magnetisation
ion
plato
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason