okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

Slug

lol

abrar?

its performative

what do you mean

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

autonomy of learning

i dont understand magnetisation

so the method has to be autonomous

plato

like first name

division of reality is straying away from it

and the fake qualifier

ahnaf abrar

we can only engage in such a way

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

idk

all that is to say

its good

so at the end

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

much more tactility

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

sorry i am texting like a slav

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

so an active mazelike process