my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
we can only engage in such a way
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
autonomy of learning
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
all that is to say
Can I see
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
so the method has to be autonomous
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
its performative
magnetisation/form
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
not so on: yvf(wthw)
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03
bro i read nothing in my life