propensity within someone
idk
all that is to say
so the method has to be autonomous
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
we need to be deconstructing our identities
i have read not even 1 book
so at the end
as in
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
what do you mean
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
is this you as well
its good
ion
magnetisation/form
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
much more tactility
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
barren land
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything