okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:11:24
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03
not their contents
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
"Put a blanket."
with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
as in
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17
Lift Analysis
magnetisation/form
currently
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
yes