okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
autonomy of learning
idk
plato
was it worth it
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
much more tactility
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
like first name
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
its good short few pages
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
all that is to say
no i haven't really read anything
i want to do that too
i really havent
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
so an active mazelike process
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
feel you
i was tempted to lie about my name
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
and the fake qualifier
propensity within someone
your feed looks like my tumblr
so the method has to be autonomous
or never left
send your tumblr
not their contents
magnetisation/form
isaac
have you read
its good