or never left
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
fw
much more tactility
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
lol yea
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
so at the end
as in
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i have read not even 1 book
all that is to say
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
One of the birds shoots out of the tree.
hiding from the rain
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
propensity within someone
I am below everything.
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49
yes