in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so the method has to be autonomous
you cannot feed someone truth
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
much more tactility
as in
propensity within someone
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
abrar?
plato
yeah
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
plato
what do you mean
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
isaac
sorry i am texting like a slav
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i was tempted to lie about my name
i love it here
...
autonomy of learning
send link
was it worth it
bro i read nothing in my life
ahnaf abrar
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.wait what is that