lol yea

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

god being the centre magnet

its good

so at the end

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

isaac

like magnets

thank you

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

plato

i understand

yeah

as in

i love it here

i dont understand magnetisation

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

Better Lift

have you read

there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.

with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

barren land

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

no longer writing in the third person