i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

magnetises a pin

what do you mean

god being the centre magnet

i dont understand magnetisation

we can only engage in such a way

thank you

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

lol

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

feel you

plato

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

all that is to say

like first name

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

have you read

ion

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

so at the end

what do you think my name is

we need to be deconstructing our identities

i want to do that too

no like which do people call me

sorry i am texting like a slav

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

yeah

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

isaac newton

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17

i love it here